Promoting Normalization For a Sick Child NCLEX
Promoting normalization for a sick child is an important aspect in the treatment process. This is because it promotes a better relationship between the parents and the child, and also helps to make the child more receptive to the treatment that is being given. The article goes on to discuss several aspects of normalization. These include the meaning of normalization for parents, the relationship between normalization and the outcomes of the treatment, and the balance between condition management and family life.
Meaning of normalization for parents
A recent study of parents of chronically ill children examined the meaning of normalization. The goal was to explore how parents of children with a chronic genetic condition viewed their family life as normal. Specifically, the researchers wanted to determine how parents interpreted their normalization efforts.
The research focused on three areas: how families manage childhood chronic conditions, what parents think is important in normalizing family life, and the consequences of normalization. The results showed that parents of chronically ill children often value normalization. However, despite the importance of normalization, not all families achieve it. The findings indicate that future studies should examine changes in normalization to better understand how it affects the lives of children.
The researchers discovered that a significant number of parents in both groups talked about time-consuming treatment regimens and parental role in managing the child’s condition. Parents in both groups also described feelings of guilt and inadequacy.
Effects of absence of normalization on family life
When a child is diagnosed with a chronic condition, it can affect the entire family. For example, the illness may affect the siblings and cause them to feel jealous, frustrated, or even angry. The disease can also result in a lack of quality “fun” time for the family. Moreover, the cost of medical care is huge. Ultimately, it can be difficult for parents to make decisions about treatment options.
The best way to help families deal with a chronic illness is to make sure that the ill child is getting the treatment that he or she needs. For example, a life-sustaining treatment such as ventilatory support could be the difference between life and death. This is particularly important when the child is an infant or a young child, but also if the child is an older child.
Several studies have shown that a chronic illness can have an adverse effect on a child’s emotional and psychological well-being. This can be due to a number of factors, including financial stress, fear of medical complications, and a loss of confidence in a parent’s abilities to care for the child.
Relationship between normalization and child outcomes
Normalization is a term used to describe parents’ efforts to create a normal family life. This approach is often considered a useful coping strategy for children with chronic conditions. However, studies have shown that not all families achieve this goal.
Research has sought to clarify the scope of normalization and how it can be used to improve the health and functioning of families affected by chronic illness. Many researchers have focused on the process dimension of normalization. This study aimed to explore the meanings that parents attribute to their efforts to normalize family life.
The research was conducted at three specialty outpatient clinics in the Midwest. Parents in two-parent families signed an informed consent form and participated in an individual semistructured interview. Several themes were identified in the parents’ perceptions of normalization. They centered on the role of management and the importance of anticipatory guidance.
The study was conducted to investigate how parents with chronic genetic conditions perceive the normalization of their child’s condition. The study sample consisted of 28 families with 48 parents. The parents were recruited from outpatient specialty clinics that served children with genetic conditions. The children were evaluated for a variety of conditions including thalassemia, Marfan’s syndrome, and single-gene disorders.